
Train operators victorious in ‘boundary fares’ wrangle
Dippy Singh
,
The high-profile class action has failed at the CAT, with the tribunal ruling that the defendants’ alleged conduct did not constitute an abuse of a dominant position.
The prominent ‘boundary fares’ collection action – which alleged that various train operators had unlawfully charged rail commuters twice for part of their journey – has been rejected by the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), with the three-member panel unanimously ruling on Friday (17 October) that the class repres
we can add extra content here, like advert, custom text
Author(s)
Dippy Singh
Tags
Boundary Fares Litigation Charles Lyndon class actions Competition Appeal Tribunal Freshfields Hausfeld Justin Gutmann Linklaters Litigation Slaughter and May
Related News
Class actions pro joins Skadden
Dippy Singh | December 19, 2025
A disputes practitioner who guides Asia-Pacific clients on US class actions, mass torts and antitrust wrangles has jumped to Skadden […]
Willkie nabs ex-White House tax bigwig
Dippy Singh | December 18, 2025
The lawyer, who served a top-tier role under the Biden administration and focuses on litigation and investigations, will head up […]
2026 US trends: AI, securities and Delaware disputes
Dippy Singh | December 17, 2025
As 2025 comes to a close, CDR explores what litigation trends await the world’s most powerful country next year.
Class actions pro joins Skadden
Dippy Singh | December 19, 2025
A disputes practitioner who guides Asia-Pacific clients on US class actions, mass torts and antitrust wrangles has jumped to Skadden […]
Willkie nabs ex-White House tax bigwig
Dippy Singh | December 18, 2025
The lawyer, who served a top-tier role under the Biden administration and focuses on litigation and investigations, will head up […]
2026 US trends: AI, securities and Delaware disputes
Dippy Singh | December 17, 2025
As 2025 comes to a close, CDR explores what litigation trends await the world’s most powerful country next year.